RESUMO
Introducción: La carga viral es un marcador muy útil para realizar el seguimiento de los pacientes infectados por VHB y VHC. Este trabajo compara ensayos basados en amplificación mediada por transcripción y en PCR a tiempo real con el objetivo de comprobar si pueden ser intercambiables. Material y métodos: Estudio bicéntrico en el que se analizó la carga viral de 147 muestras de plasma de pacientes infectados por VHB y 229 por VHC, mediante ensayos basados en amplificación mediada por transcripción (Aptima® HBV Quant y Aptima® HCV Quant Dx, que utilizan el sistema Panther (Hologic®)) y PCR a tiempo real (COBAS® AmpliPrep / COBAS® TaqMan® y COBAS® 6800), calculando el grado de concordancia entre ellos. Resultados: Se detectó carga viral en ambos equipos en 60 (40,82%) muestras de VHB (mediana del log de la carga viral: COBAS®: 2,51UI/mL (RIC 2,20-3,17), Panther: 2,71UI/mL (RIC 2,21-3,22)) y en 39 (16,96%) muestras de VHC (mediana del log de la carga viral: COBAS®: 3,93UI/mL (RIC 2,24-6,01), Panther: 3,80UI/mL (RIC 1,99-6,14)). La concordancia entre ambos equipos fue de κ=0,943 para VHB y κ=0,925 para VHC. La comparación de las muestras con carga viral detectada mediante los 2 ensayos mostró una correlación alta tanto para VHB (R2=0,86) como para VHC (R2=0,97). Conclusiones: Los ensayos basados tanto en amplificación mediada por transcripción como en PCR a tiempo real pueden ser intercambiables para el manejo de pacientes infectados con VHB y VHC.(AU)
Introduction: Viral load is a very useful marker for monitoring patients infected with HBV and HCV. This work compares assays based on transcription-mediated amplification and on real-time PCR to verify whether they can be interchangeable. Material and methods: a bicentric study, in which 147 plasma samples from patients infected with HBV and 229 with HCV were analyzed, was carried out. Transcription-mediated amplification-based assays (Aptima® HBV Quant and Aptima® HCV Quant Dx, employing Panther system (Hologic®)) and on real-time PCR (COBAS® AmpliPrep / COBAS® TaqMan® and COBAS® 6800) were used and the degree of concordance between them was calculated. Results: Viral load was detected in both systems in 60 (40.82%) HBV samples (median log viral load: COBAS®: 2.51IU/mL (IQR 2.20-3.17), Panther: 2.71IU/mL (IQR 2.21-3.22)) and in 39 (16.96%) HCV samples (median log viral load: COBAS®: 3.93IU/mL (IQR 2.24-6.01), Panther: 3.80IU/mL (IQR 1.99-6.14)). The agreement between both systems was κ=0.943 for HBV and κ=0.925 for HCV. Comparison of viral load samples detected by both assays showed a hight correlation for HBV (R2=0.86) and for HCV (R2=0.97). Conclusions: Both transcription-mediated amplification and on real-time PCR based assays may be interchangeable for the management of patients infected with HBV and HCV.(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Vírus da Hepatite B , Hepacivirus/genética , Plasma/virologia , Carga Viral , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Microbiologia , Técnicas Microbiológicas , Reação em Cadeia da PolimeraseRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: More than two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 still remains a global public health problem. Successive waves of infection have produced new SARS-CoV-2 variants with new mutations for which the impact on COVID-19 severity and patient survival is uncertain. METHODS: A total of 764 SARS-CoV-2 genomes, sequenced from COVID-19 patients, hospitalized from 19th February 2020 to 30 April 2021, along with their clinical data, were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: A significant association of B.1.1.7, the alpha lineage, with patient mortality (log hazard ratio (LHR) = 0.51, C.I. = [0.14,0.88]) was found upon adjustment by all the covariates known to affect COVID-19 prognosis. Moreover, survival analysis of mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 genome revealed 27 of them were significantly associated with higher mortality of patients. Most of these mutations were located in the genes coding for the S, ORF8, and N proteins. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates how a combination of genomic and clinical data can provide solid evidence for the impact of viral lineage on patient survival.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Genoma Viral , Humanos , Mutação , Pandemias , Filogenia , SARS-CoV-2/genéticaRESUMO
The present guideline has the objective of identifying the most appropriate diagnostic test and/or diagnostic/screening approach for1) patients with signs and symptoms of COVID-19; 2) travelers from areas with low and high COVID-19 prevalence, healthcare workers, and other individuals at risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2; 3) asymptomatic individuals (including general population) and 4) those with close contact with a person infected with SARS-CoV-2; and 5) symptomatic individuals following re-infection and/or vaccination. However, evidence for re-infection and post-vaccination testing approach was scarce when the literature search for the index guidelines was performed. Hence, associated PICOs could not be addressed. Additional considerations include the type of biomaterial, time since onset of symptoms/contact with infectious case, age, disease severity, and risk of developing severe disease. The document is intended to provide guidance to clinicians, clinical microbiologists, other health care personnel, and decision makers.
